sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem)
- From: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>
- To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Cc: SourceMage Sorcery List <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem)
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:36:55 +0100
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:45:50AM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>:
> > If such checking was added, then it would be applied automaticaly by
> > sorcery to all spells. No sense in having 1500 spells with the same
> > triggers. Version stuff is not easy to do reliably, but if we were anal
> > and only did this for spells that have version <int>.<int>.<int> it
> > would simplify the matter. It would add an extra step to dependancy
> > gathering, and is pretty much useless without the full ordering that I'm
> > working on. The full ordering is getting close, but has a problem with
> > provides... it's not something that's going to make it into stable (or
> > devel for that matter) sorcery this close to SMGL 1.0 until it is well
> > tested.
>
> Perhaps we should put off 1.0 until full depends are in? I think those are
> very
> important to keep a stable system (otherwise you get lots of failures
> reports
> if you try to update an entire system, or even just a windowmanager
> collection). It would make system-update safe(r) along with a rebuild.
>
No, never...
erics
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem)
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem), Eric Schabell, 02/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem), Eric Sandall, 02/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem), Eric Sandall, 02/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem), Ondra Tomecka, 02/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem),
Paul, 02/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem),
Eric Sandall, 02/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem),
Eric Schabell, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem),
Eric Sandall, 02/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem), Hamish Greig, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem),
Eric Sandall, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem),
Eric Schabell, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem),
Eric Sandall, 02/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem), Hamish Greig, 02/04/2004
-
RE: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem),
Eric Sandall, 02/04/2004
-
RE: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem),
Jens Laas, 02/05/2004
- RE: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem), Ondra Tomecka, 02/05/2004
- RE: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem), Eric Sandall, 02/05/2004
- RE: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem), Eric Sandall, 02/05/2004
-
RE: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem),
Jens Laas, 02/05/2004
- RE: [SM-Sorcery] wget .so dependencies (possibly global problem), Ondra Tomecka, 02/04/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.