sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:06:51 -0700
Well.. yeah that's always the idea. It's really hard to "make sure" everything
works before you check it in because lots of times you have to compile
lots of stuff to find out.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 07:47:17AM -0500, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> I was kind of wondering when "dont beak the build" philosophy would
> start to kick in. Figured it would just happen by itself, so I was
> waiting. :)
>
> It seems like a decent idea Nick. Besides, I have a burning desire to
> have to buy people lots of cake, or something. ;P
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 03:45 AM, Eric Schabell wrote:
>
> >> On Thursday October 10 2002 20:07, Nick Jennings wrote:
> >> Well we aren't going to get into the business of hourly (or close to
> >> hourly) CVS tarball. The main reason being that the CVS repository
> >> can get broken sometimes in the middle of the day. I try to make a
> >> concious effort to stabilize my work before the nightly tarball is
> >> created (not that it always helps).
> >>
> > I was under the impression that correct usage of a repository was only
> > to
> > commit your code once it works... we always had a running rule in my
> > commercial programming projects that a programmer that commits code
> > containing (later detected) bug(s), was required to buy every project
> > member
> > a cake for the coffee breaks.... maybe an idea? Or are you afraid...
> > ;-)
> >
> > --
> > /*
> > * drs. Eric Schabell
> > * web: http://www.schabell.com
> > * SourceMage: http://www.sourcemage.org
> > * Shopping: http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=sourcemage.0
> > * irc.openprojects.org (#sourcemage)
> > * nick -> erics
> > */
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Sorcery mailing list
> > SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
>
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Nick Jennings, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Dufflebunk, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.