sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- To: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- Cc: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:56:40 -0500
Good Idea.
Done.
-Ryan
On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 03:07 PM, Nick Jennings wrote:
Perhaps, ryan can set download.sourcemage.org to use wget -N when downloading
the devel tarball (he already uses it for the stable tarball). And he
can have it attempt to download it every hour. That way, if a major
bug pops up. Once it's fixed, I can run re-roll the tarball, and
the next time download.sourcemage.org checks, it will see it's newer
and download it.
This should only need to happen every once in a while, but when it's
needed, it would be good to have in place.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:12:57PM -0400, Sergey A Lipnevich wrote:
I completely agree that more branches is not a solution. What I suggest_______________________________________________
implies that I don't mind sorcery breaking in the middle of the day.
Because of the time zones etc., there's really no point in sticking to
end-of-the-day-integrity. If it breaks at noon, it would get integral in
four hours again, maybe.
Actually, I'm saying this for the sake of the argument, because everyone
can check it out of CVS anyway. If people start doing this too often for
your server to tolerate, we might need readjustment of schedule.
Thanks!
Sergey.
Nick Jennings wrote:
Well we aren't going to get into the business of hourly (or close to
hourly) CVS tarball. The main reason being that the CVS repository
can get broken sometimes in the middle of the day. I try to make a
concious effort to stabilize my work before the nightly tarball is
created (not that it always helps).
I think the only option to satisfy what you are suggesting would
be to just have another branch, sorcery-cvs which does a real-time
anonymous checkout from cvs.sourcemage.org. Although I personally
do not like the idea (two branches is enough). Some people have asked
for it...
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 01:39:57PM -0400, Sergey A Lipnevich wrote:
Is it possible to pull devel sorcery from CVS every, say, four hours?
Also, ViewCVS has a feature that allows one to dynamically create a
tarball of any given directory (and I have patches to make it tar.bz2
instead of tar.gz). This is an additional load on the server, but if
Nick is not against enabling the feature and restricting access to, say,
pre-set IP address or domain of sourcemage.org, it might be even easier
to pull updates from CVS. I assume no "repackaging" is required, of
course. What do you say, Nick, Ryan?
Thanks!
Sergey.
Dufflebunk wrote:
Cast was fixed in CVS this afternoon, I'm not sure why it didn't make it_______________________________________________
into the nightly tarball. Tomorrow should be safe.
The sorcery update on the other hand has not been fixed yet and should
have a bug opened for it.
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 03:00, Andrew wrote:
after doing a sorcery update to load up the latest sorcery scripts nothing runs.
here is the output from sorcery update
root@thefrayedknot:/tmp/sorcery# sorcery update
/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `_M_depends_bzip2_M_on_=""'
/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_bzip2_M_on_=""'
/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `_M_depends_bzip2_M_off_=""'
/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_bzip2_M_off_=""'
/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `_M_depends_bzip2_M_type_="required"'
/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_bzip2_M_type_="required"'
/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `_M_depends_cpio_M_on_=""'
/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_cpio_M_on_=""'
/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `_M_depends_cpio_M_off_=""'
/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_cpio_M_off_=""'
/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `_M_depends_cpio_M_type_="required"'
/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_cpio_M_type_="required"'
root@thefrayedknot:/tmp/sorcery#
i of course ctrl-c'd out of this
cast does similiar stuff:
root@thefrayedknot:/tmp/sorcery# cast foo
/usr/sbin/cast: line 70: syntax error near unexpected token `else'
/usr/sbin/cast: line 70: ` else'
root@thefrayedknot:/tmp/sorcery#
let me know when it is safe to update again
_______________________________________________
SM-Sorcery mailing list
SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
SM-Sorcery mailing list
SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
_______________________________________________
SM-Sorcery mailing list
SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
SM-Sorcery mailing list
SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Dufflebunk, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Eric Schabell, 10/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Eric Schabell, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Nick Jennings, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Dufflebunk, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Dufflebunk, 10/10/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.