sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:07:01 -0700
Perhaps, ryan can set download.sourcemage.org to use wget -N when downloading
the devel tarball (he already uses it for the stable tarball). And he
can have it attempt to download it every hour. That way, if a major
bug pops up. Once it's fixed, I can run re-roll the tarball, and
the next time download.sourcemage.org checks, it will see it's newer
and download it.
This should only need to happen every once in a while, but when it's
needed, it would be good to have in place.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:12:57PM -0400, Sergey A Lipnevich wrote:
> I completely agree that more branches is not a solution. What I suggest
> implies that I don't mind sorcery breaking in the middle of the day.
> Because of the time zones etc., there's really no point in sticking to
> end-of-the-day-integrity. If it breaks at noon, it would get integral in
> four hours again, maybe.
> Actually, I'm saying this for the sake of the argument, because everyone
> can check it out of CVS anyway. If people start doing this too often for
> your server to tolerate, we might need readjustment of schedule.
> Thanks!
>
> Sergey.
>
> Nick Jennings wrote:
>
> >Well we aren't going to get into the business of hourly (or close to
> >hourly) CVS tarball. The main reason being that the CVS repository
> >can get broken sometimes in the middle of the day. I try to make a
> >concious effort to stabilize my work before the nightly tarball is
> >created (not that it always helps).
> >
> >I think the only option to satisfy what you are suggesting would
> >be to just have another branch, sorcery-cvs which does a real-time
> >anonymous checkout from cvs.sourcemage.org. Although I personally
> >do not like the idea (two branches is enough). Some people have asked
> >for it...
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 01:39:57PM -0400, Sergey A Lipnevich wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Is it possible to pull devel sorcery from CVS every, say, four hours?
> >>
> >>Also, ViewCVS has a feature that allows one to dynamically create a
> >>tarball of any given directory (and I have patches to make it tar.bz2
> >>instead of tar.gz). This is an additional load on the server, but if
> >>Nick is not against enabling the feature and restricting access to, say,
> >>pre-set IP address or domain of sourcemage.org, it might be even easier
> >>to pull updates from CVS. I assume no "repackaging" is required, of
> >>course. What do you say, Nick, Ryan?
> >>Thanks!
> >>
> >>Sergey.
> >>
> >>Dufflebunk wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Cast was fixed in CVS this afternoon, I'm not sure why it didn't make it
> >>>into the nightly tarball. Tomorrow should be safe.
> >>>The sorcery update on the other hand has not been fixed yet and should
> >>>have a bug opened for it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 03:00, Andrew wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>after doing a sorcery update to load up the latest sorcery scripts
> >>>>nothing runs.
> >>>>here is the output from sorcery update
> >>>>root@thefrayedknot:/tmp/sorcery# sorcery update
> >>>>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token
> >>>>`_M_depends_bzip2_M_on_=""'
> >>>>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_bzip2_M_on_=""'
> >>>>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token
> >>>>`_M_depends_bzip2_M_off_=""'
> >>>>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_bzip2_M_off_=""'
> >>>>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token
> >>>>`_M_depends_bzip2_M_type_="required"'
> >>>>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1:
> >>>>`HASH_()_M_depends_bzip2_M_type_="required"'
> >>>>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token
> >>>>`_M_depends_cpio_M_on_=""'
> >>>>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_cpio_M_on_=""'
> >>>>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token
> >>>>`_M_depends_cpio_M_off_=""'
> >>>>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_cpio_M_off_=""'
> >>>>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token
> >>>>`_M_depends_cpio_M_type_="required"'
> >>>>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1:
> >>>>`HASH_()_M_depends_cpio_M_type_="required"'
> >>>>
> >>>>root@thefrayedknot:/tmp/sorcery#
> >>>>i of course ctrl-c'd out of this
> >>>>cast does similiar stuff:
> >>>>
> >>>>root@thefrayedknot:/tmp/sorcery# cast foo
> >>>>/usr/sbin/cast: line 70: syntax error near unexpected token `else'
> >>>>/usr/sbin/cast: line 70: ` else'
> >>>>root@thefrayedknot:/tmp/sorcery#
> >>>>
> >>>>let me know when it is safe to update again
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>SM-Sorcery mailing list
> >>>>SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> >>>>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>SM-Sorcery mailing list
> >>SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> >>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
>
-
[SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Andrew, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Dufflebunk, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Eric Schabell, 10/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Eric Schabell, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Nick Jennings, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Dufflebunk, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Dufflebunk, 10/10/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.