sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- To: Sergey A Lipnevich <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
- Cc: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:07:55 -0700
Well we aren't going to get into the business of hourly (or close to
hourly) CVS tarball. The main reason being that the CVS repository
can get broken sometimes in the middle of the day. I try to make a
concious effort to stabilize my work before the nightly tarball is
created (not that it always helps).
I think the only option to satisfy what you are suggesting would
be to just have another branch, sorcery-cvs which does a real-time
anonymous checkout from cvs.sourcemage.org. Although I personally
do not like the idea (two branches is enough). Some people have asked
for it...
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 01:39:57PM -0400, Sergey A Lipnevich wrote:
> Is it possible to pull devel sorcery from CVS every, say, four hours?
>
> Also, ViewCVS has a feature that allows one to dynamically create a
> tarball of any given directory (and I have patches to make it tar.bz2
> instead of tar.gz). This is an additional load on the server, but if
> Nick is not against enabling the feature and restricting access to, say,
> pre-set IP address or domain of sourcemage.org, it might be even easier
> to pull updates from CVS. I assume no "repackaging" is required, of
> course. What do you say, Nick, Ryan?
> Thanks!
>
> Sergey.
>
> Dufflebunk wrote:
>
> >Cast was fixed in CVS this afternoon, I'm not sure why it didn't make it
> >into the nightly tarball. Tomorrow should be safe.
> >The sorcery update on the other hand has not been fixed yet and should
> >have a bug opened for it.
> >
> >
> >On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 03:00, Andrew wrote:
> >
> >
> >>after doing a sorcery update to load up the latest sorcery scripts
> >>nothing runs.
> >>here is the output from sorcery update
> >>root@thefrayedknot:/tmp/sorcery# sorcery update
> >>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token
> >>`_M_depends_bzip2_M_on_=""'
> >>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_bzip2_M_on_=""'
> >>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token
> >>`_M_depends_bzip2_M_off_=""'
> >>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_bzip2_M_off_=""'
> >>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token
> >>`_M_depends_bzip2_M_type_="required"'
> >>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1:
> >>`HASH_()_M_depends_bzip2_M_type_="required"'
> >>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token
> >>`_M_depends_cpio_M_on_=""'
> >>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_cpio_M_on_=""'
> >>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token
> >>`_M_depends_cpio_M_off_=""'
> >>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: `HASH_()_M_depends_cpio_M_off_=""'
> >>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token
> >>`_M_depends_cpio_M_type_="required"'
> >>/usr/sbin/sorcery: eval: line 1:
> >>`HASH_()_M_depends_cpio_M_type_="required"'
> >>
> >>root@thefrayedknot:/tmp/sorcery#
> >>i of course ctrl-c'd out of this
> >>cast does similiar stuff:
> >>
> >>root@thefrayedknot:/tmp/sorcery# cast foo
> >>/usr/sbin/cast: line 70: syntax error near unexpected token `else'
> >>/usr/sbin/cast: line 70: ` else'
> >>root@thefrayedknot:/tmp/sorcery#
> >>
> >>let me know when it is safe to update again
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>SM-Sorcery mailing list
> >>SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> >>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
> >>
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
>
-
[SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Andrew, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Dufflebunk, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Eric Schabell, 10/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Eric Schabell, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Nick Jennings, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working., Dufflebunk, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Nick Jennings, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Ryan Abrams, 10/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]latest sorcery not working.,
Dufflebunk, 10/10/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.