sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
- From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- To: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: "Julian v. Bock" <julian AT openit.de>, eric AT schabell.com, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:28:36 -0700
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 02:32:03PM -0500, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> Pretty close. You may want to run $FILE through fuzzy_download though..
> there is no telling which extension it's gonna be.
yes there is, if we mirror it, it should be the same as whats privided
by the maintainer.
>
> -Ryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nick Jennings" <nkj AT namodn.com>
> To: "Julian v. Bock" <julian AT openit.de>
> Cc: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>; <eric AT schabell.com>;
> <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
>
>
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:38:03PM +0200, Julian v. Bock wrote:
> > >
> > > That is a damn good reason if you ask me.
> > >
> > > 1. looking for spell triggers or some uid/gid assignments is much
> > > less work. Most spells don't need to be modified.
> > >
> > > 2. Why let maintainers change around 1500 spells for something that
> > > are about one or two lines in summon??
> >
> > OK. Good point. So this is as simple as:
> >
> > (if all attempts fail)... use:
> > $SM_MIRROR_URL/$GRIMOIRE/$SECTION/$FILE
> >
> > ?
>
>
-
[SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Eric Schabell, 08/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Ryan Abrams, 08/13/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Andrew Stitt, 08/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Nick Jennings, 08/13/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Andrew Stitt, 08/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Ryan Abrams, 08/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Nick Jennings, 08/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Julian v. Bock, 08/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Nick Jennings, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Nick Jennings, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Jonathan Evraire, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Jonathan Evraire, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Julian v. Bock, 08/15/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Nick Jennings, 08/15/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Nick Jennings, 08/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Julian v. Bock, 08/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Nick Jennings, 08/14/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Ryan Abrams, 08/13/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Nick Jennings, 08/14/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Derber, Geoffrey, 08/15/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.