sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
- From: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- To: "Nick Jennings" <nkj AT namodn.com>, "Julian v. Bock" <julian AT openit.de>
- Cc: <eric AT schabell.com>, <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:46:19 -0500
I have to agree with Julian on this.
Simply adding something to the end of the loop in summon that says if all
attempts fail, try again at
http://download.sourcemage.org/mirror/$DISTRO_VERSION/$GRIMOIRE/$SPELL-$VERS
ION.tar.bz2 or whatever is not difficult, and is more reliable for all
spells.
-Ryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian v. Bock" <julian AT openit.de>
To: "Nick Jennings" <nkj AT namodn.com>
Cc: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>; <eric AT schabell.com>;
<sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
> Hi
>
> >>>>> "NJ" == Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com> writes:
>
> NJ> I think it would be better for the spells in the grimoire to
> NJ> statically specify their mirror URL as a "last resort"
> NJ> specifically because the coding of the logic into sorcery seems to
> NJ> just increase the complexity and bloat of a simple cast.
>
> NJ> Fundamentally :why: should this be in sorcery? (Aside from the
> NJ> fact that spell maintainers will have some work to do, which will
> NJ> need to be done anyways for spell_triggers, as well as UID/GID
> NJ> assignment).
>
> That is a damn good reason if you ask me.
>
> 1. looking for spell triggers or some uid/gid assignments is much
> less work. Most spells don't need to be modified.
>
> 2. Why let maintainers change around 1500 spells for something that
> are about one or two lines in summon??
>
> Julian
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Nick Jennings, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Nick Jennings, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Jonathan Evraire, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Jonathan Evraire, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Julian v. Bock, 08/15/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Nick Jennings, 08/15/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Ryan Abrams, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Nick Jennings, 08/14/2002
-
RE: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Derber, Geoffrey, 08/15/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/15/2002
-
RE: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Derber, Geoffrey, 08/15/2002
- RE: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Casey Harkins, 08/15/2002
- RE: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Derber, Geoffrey, 08/15/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?,
Nick Jennings, 08/14/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.