sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
- From: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- To: "Derber, Geoffrey" <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.Edu>, "'Nick Jennings '" <nkj AT namodn.com>
- Cc: "'Julian v. Bock '" <julian AT openit.de>, <eric AT schabell.com>, <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:38:46 -0500
I dont want to put that strain on the servers. bz2 is relatively processor
expensive, and we are talking about a LOT of bz2-ing.
-Ryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Derber, Geoffrey" <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.Edu>
To: "'Nick Jennings '" <nkj AT namodn.com>; "'Ryan Abrams '"
<rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
Cc: "'Julian v. Bock '" <julian AT openit.de>; <eric AT schabell.com>;
<sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 1:15 PM
Subject: RE: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
> If we mirror it, and if we wanted to take the time, we could always force
it
> to be a bz2.
>
> Geoff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Jennings
> To: Ryan Abrams
> Cc: Julian v. Bock; eric AT schabell.com; sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Sent: 8/14/02 3:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 02:32:03PM -0500, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> > Pretty close. You may want to run $FILE through fuzzy_download
> though..
> > there is no telling which extension it's gonna be.
>
> yes there is, if we mirror it, it should be the same as whats privided
> by the maintainer.
>
> >
> > -Ryan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nick Jennings" <nkj AT namodn.com>
> > To: "Julian v. Bock" <julian AT openit.de>
> > Cc: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>; <eric AT schabell.com>;
> > <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:38:03PM +0200, Julian v. Bock wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That is a damn good reason if you ask me.
> > > >
> > > > 1. looking for spell triggers or some uid/gid assignments is much
> > > > less work. Most spells don't need to be modified.
> > > >
> > > > 2. Why let maintainers change around 1500 spells for something
> that
> > > > are about one or two lines in summon??
> > >
> > > OK. Good point. So this is as simple as:
> > >
> > > (if all attempts fail)... use:
> > > $SM_MIRROR_URL/$GRIMOIRE/$SECTION/$FILE
> > >
> > > ?
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Jonathan Evraire, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Jonathan Evraire, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Julian v. Bock, 08/15/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Nick Jennings, 08/15/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/15/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Nick Jennings, 08/14/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Ryan Abrams, 08/15/2002
- RE: [SM-Sorcery]Fall back for spells source url's?, Casey Harkins, 08/15/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.