Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] Gnome section - Updating to Beta.

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Geoffrey Derber <gderber AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT go-nix.ca>
  • Cc: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>, sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Gnome section - Updating to Beta.
  • Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 13:51:09 -0500

Dufflebunk wrote:
So perhaps we need 4 devel grimoires to handle that: devel-spells,
devel-software, devel-both, and just devel... no I'm not serious. I don't
see why there should be another grimoire, devel is already supposed to be
the lunatic grimoire, isn't it?


Bah, ment to send this to everyone

Well, IMO, that's if we do it at all. From the what was discussed a while back, the grimoires represent the stability of the spell more than the stability of the software the spell installs. The stability of the software is supposed to be the latest stable release.

devel grimoire = devel spell, not devel software the spell installs
test grimoire = tested spell
stable grimoire = stable spell

this referes back to this thread:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2003-July/003824.html

where Eric Sandall commented on those definitions above:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2003-July/003860.html

Geoff







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page