sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
- To: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- Cc: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>, sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 01:47:41 -0400
That's why I believe pretending that 4.1 is 4.0 in disguise is not a solution and change 13350 has to be reverted.
Hamish Greig wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 15:00, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
Andrew, I have a question about the change you made.it was for that reason that i decided not to make a symlink on my system and too rebuild the system against the newer version of db.
Certain DB initialization function increased the number of parameters
between 4.0 and 4.1. What would keep software relying on your solution
from dumping core or smashing the stack because of this change? They'll
be calling with one parameter less than required. How did you test that
something actually works because of this fix? I don't mean linkage, I
mean functionality. I apologize if I'm missing something abvious here.
Thanks!
this was a major version upgrade not just a minor one. If we had gone from 4.0.14 to 4.0.15 i would not have hesitated to do this.the best solution to this is to make a post install file for certain apps like zlib has.
that way when the major version changes everything linked against it gets rebuilt.
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Andrew, 06/21/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Hamish Greig, 06/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Eric Sandall, 06/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Andrew, 06/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Andrew, 06/21/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/21/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics, Hamish Greig, 06/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Andrew, 06/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Andrew, 06/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Eric Sandall, 06/21/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Andrew, 06/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] grimoire semantics,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/21/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.