sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: "M.L." <mlubrano AT sourcemage.org>
- To: julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock), Ladislav Hagara <hgr AT vabo.cz>
- Cc: eric AT sandall.us, sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:32:05 +0100
Hi,
a similar trick should make glibc updates a lot easyer... since if you don't
remove old glibc files before installing and sylinking to new ones it's all
right (otherwise, you get the famous GLIB_2_2.... infinite errors and enter a
shitty world).
Bye,
Mat.
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:56:27 +0100, Julian v. Bock wrote
> Hi
>
> >>>>> "LH" == Ladislav Hagara <hgr AT vabo.cz> writes:
>
> LH> So, sorcery could allow installing two version of libraries: new
> LH> one and binary files from older one, if it is fitting. It could
> LH> probably solve probles like this: new gpa depends on new gpgme,
> LH> but most of spells depended on gpgme needs old version of gpgme,
> LH> so we can only install old gpa. If we had two versions of
> LH> libraries installed, we could use old ones and new ones versions
> LH> concurrently.
>
> This works only as long as the library authors know what sonames are
> and how to use them properly. Unfortunately this is not always the
> case ;) so we can't expect this to work for all shared libs.
>
> If sorcery supports this feature it should issue a warning.
>
> Julian
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Grimoire mailing list
> SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
//
// M.L.
// Linux User #36502 ; ICQ #23832402
//
-
[SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
snakebyte / Eric Sesterhenn, 01/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Ladislav Hagara, 01/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Adam Clark, 01/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Ladislav Hagara, 01/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Eric Womack, 01/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Treeve Jelbert, 01/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Eric Sandall, 01/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Ladislav Hagara, 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Julian v. Bock, 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, M.L., 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Julian v. Bock, 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, M.L., 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Julian v. Bock, 01/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Eric Sandall, 01/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Ladislav Hagara, 01/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Adam Clark, 01/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Ladislav Hagara, 01/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Adam Clark, 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Adam Clark, 01/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Adam Clark, 01/10/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.