sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
- To: Adam Clark <adamsgl AT dhbit.ca>
- Cc: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7
- Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 23:08:19 -0500
This is true, but what's also true is that Julian introduced the new fixincludes-related question in CONFIGURE very gradually and had only recently changed the default to 'n', so there was simply not enough time yet to assess the impact. Any such post that you suggest, in the event that the switch actually produced new problems in addition to solving old ones, would be a very bad and unwise thing to do. I think that the pace of open-source development is not constant and is usually slow.
Adam Clark wrote:
Hi Sergey, All,
Okay, this is great to know that it's not really "our" fault (that being
"the spell's fault"), but what we need to do in these kinds of situations,
when we know about it, it post the information publically, like on
news.sourcemage.org.
In fact, I'm sure a post explaining how many problems fixincludes is
bringing up for us might help bunches of us who really don't want our
systems being taken out by the problem. =)
At least, that's the feeling I get after watching the threads about
ncurses.h and more recently the painful screams of people in #sourcemage who
have had openssh die on them. heh.
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 16:08:41 -0500
"Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergeyli AT pisem.net> wrote:
Guess what, this is a fixincludes problem, see the last comment at http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462, right here: http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462#c13.
Adam Clark wrote:
Lad,_______________________________________________
It appears people are having major problems with openssh after doing the
openssl update. Have you tried re-starting openssh after recompiling it?
Are you not getting the library errors?
I'm not writing about this iffy openssl upgrade for my health - it was a
serious problem trying to do it months ago when I was handling the crypto
section, and by the sounds of things, it hasn't got any better. I don't
think any other software is ready for 0.9.7 yet.
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 23:38:45 +0100
Ladislav Hagara <hgr AT vabo.cz> wrote:
what about a check wheter the libssl.so.0.9.7 and libcrypto.so.0.9.7To recast every "installed" spells depended on openssl you can use:
libs already exists, and if not reƤ-cast every spell dependend on ssl?
cast -c $(gaze depends openssl | cut -f1 -d:)
- lace -
_______________________________________________
SM-Grimoire mailing list
SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
SM-Grimoire mailing list
SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Eric Womack, 01/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Treeve Jelbert, 01/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Eric Sandall, 01/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Ladislav Hagara, 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Julian v. Bock, 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, M.L., 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Julian v. Bock, 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, M.L., 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Julian v. Bock, 01/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Eric Sandall, 01/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Adam Clark, 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Adam Clark, 01/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7,
Adam Clark, 01/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: openssl 0.9.7, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/11/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.