sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells
- Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 12:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Andrew Stitt wrote:
>
> a compromise (one im not happy with) would be to allow bugs of this
> nature to be cc'd to everyone on the grimoire team, so we dont have to
> dable through bugzilla for 5 minutes everytime we want to do something.
>
This sounds like a good compromise to me.
Why wouldn't you be happy about it though?
Seth
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Eric Sandall, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Andrew Stitt, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Ryan Abrams, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Jeremy Kolb, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Seth Woolley, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Andrew Stitt, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Ryan Abrams, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Seth Woolley, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Eric Sandall, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Seth Woolley, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Andrew Stitt, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Seth Woolley, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Andrew Stitt, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Seth Woolley, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Andrew Stitt, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Dufflebunk, 09/07/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.