sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock)
- To: Jon Svendsen <jon-sven AT frisurf.no>
- Cc: Eric Sandall <sandalle AT hellhound.homeip.net>, sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce
- Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 11:35:54 +0200
Hi
>>>>> "JS" == Jon Svendsen <jon-sven AT frisurf.no> writes:
JS> As a reference to this, I thought I'd describe the solution used
JS> by the GNOME project to address the who-can-commit-where
JS> problem. In GNOME CVS, the root directory of each module contains
JS> a file called HACKING. Into this file, the module maintainers can
JS> write "rules" for how other hackers should behave when dealing
JS> with that module.
IMO this is a very good idea. Personally, I think it is ok if other
people update devel/libs spells, especially when they are directly
related to their sections (Sergey, I will update the nss_ldap spell
today ;-).
However, I want to approve the changes. Otherwise some dolt will go
and update gettext ("compiles fine on my box") and break spells like
bash.
Julian
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Julian v. Bock, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Andrew Stitt, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Ryan Abrams, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Dufflebunk, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Andrew Stitt, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Dufflebunk, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Ryan Abrams, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Eric Sandall, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Ryan Abrams, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Andrew Stitt, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Eric Sandall, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Jon Svendsen, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Julian v. Bock, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Ryan Abrams, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Eric Sandall, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Jason Flatt, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Eric Sandall, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Jon Svendsen, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Laurent Wandrebeck, 08/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Eric Sandall, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/06/2002
-
RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Derber, Geoffrey, 08/06/2002
- RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Eric Sandall, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Julian v. Bock, 08/06/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.