sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: "Eric Sandall" <sandalle AT hellhound.homeip.net>
- To: <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
This is why, if we can't agree on using only one SCM, we need to sync in
both directions with CVS and Perforce, that way it will not matter which
SCM the helper/guru uses as it will soon be synced with the other.
I still think we should move to one SCM for all developers and that the
SCM should be Open Sourced, but having one SCM will make things more
cogniscent (sp?).
-One of Three
Derber, Geoffrey said:
> I agree.
>
> Geoff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: julian AT openit.de
> To: Source Mage Grimoire
> Sent: 8/6/02 3:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce
>
> Hi
>
>>>>>> "AS" == Andrew Stitt <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
> writes:
>
> AS> That also gives us
> AS> a huge advantage towards the p4 vs cvs debate because then each AS>
> section, according to the official maintainer, can be either p4 or AS>
> cvs, and anyone wishing to work on that section must use the
> AS> maintainers choice.
>
> Nobody who wants to contribute (help the maintainer; do the work while
> the maintainer is on vacation; etc.) should be forced to use unfree
> software (p4).
>
> Julian
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Grimoire mailing list
> SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Grimoire mailing list
> SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
sandalle AT hellhound.homeip.net | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://hellhound.homeip.net/~sandalle | SystAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
ICQ: 667348 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Julian v. Bock, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Ryan Abrams, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Eric Sandall, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Jason Flatt, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Eric Sandall, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Laurent Wandrebeck, 08/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/06/2002
-
RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Derber, Geoffrey, 08/06/2002
-
RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Eric Sandall, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Mads Laursen, 08/06/2002
-
RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Eric Sandall, 08/06/2002
- RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Derber, Geoffrey, 08/06/2002
-
RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Derber, Geoffrey, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Andrew Stitt, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Derber, Geoffrey, 08/07/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.