sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement
- From: Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:32:52 -0500
On Oct 07, Ismael Luceno [ismael.luceno AT gmail.com] wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 04:18:29 -0500
> Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org> wrote:
> > On Sep 29, Ismael Luceno [ismael.luceno AT gmail.com] wrote:
> > > When it comes to visibility, IMO, where we have our repositories is
> > > completely irrelevant,
> >
> > It absolutely is not irrelevant in the current environment of
> > cloud-everything. We are seeing the advent of an entire generation
> > that considers "git<cloud> hosted" as the minimum for a project worth
> > their time.
>
> And it's absolutely not worth recruiting those wimps. Seriously. We
> could even move to CVS and it would have almost no impact.
Thinking they are the wimps is a pretty major oversight. Whether we like it
or not, quite a lot of the state of the art is out there these days, and
there's an entire generation now that won't know any time before that.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Ismael Luceno, 10/01/2015
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Jeremy Blosser, 10/03/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Thomas Orgis, 10/05/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Sukneet Basuta, 10/05/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Ismael Luceno, 10/07/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Kevin Monceaux, 10/07/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Jeremy Blosser, 10/07/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Thomas Orgis, 10/05/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Jeremy Blosser, 10/03/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Jeremy Blosser, 10/03/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 10/07/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Jeremy Blosser, 10/07/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 10/08/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Jeremy Blosser, 10/08/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 10/08/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Jeremy Blosser, 10/07/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 10/07/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.