sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement
- From: Sukneet Basuta <sukneet AT gmail.com>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:24:30 -0600
On 5 Oct 2015 15:02, "Thomas Orgis" <thomas-forum AT orgis.org> wrote:
>
> Am Sat, 3 Oct 2015 04:18:29 -0500
> schrieb Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>:
>
> > On Sep 29, Ismael Luceno [ismael.luceno AT gmail.com] wrote:
>
> > > Also, although less important, most are unhappy about having to
> > > configure every minute detail the first time (this is something we
> > > could easily solve, without compromising our goals),
> >
> > I don't see how, given how integral "we promise to install upstream
> > defauts, unless you tell us otherwise" is to who we are. It's nearly the
> > entire point.
>
> I want to hook in here: I dream of a SMGL install/rebuild/update that I
> can start and actually expect it to finish unattended. I don't want
> things to be carefully tuned and preconfigured, all I want is that I'm
> not _forced_ to reconfigure everything to have a working system at all.
>
> I think it should be a valid way to do a SMGL install to do it with
> PROMPT_DELAY=0. and only `cast -r` stuff that one cares about. Of
> course, part of this is handling of cyclic dependencies.
I think Jeremy is saying that is a valid way, and doing that should just install upstream's defaults.
The problem is lots of spells fail if you do that--or at least they do in my experience. That's actually why I initially started contributing to Source Mage.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Ismael Luceno, 10/01/2015
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Jeremy Blosser, 10/03/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Thomas Orgis, 10/05/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Sukneet Basuta, 10/05/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Ismael Luceno, 10/07/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Kevin Monceaux, 10/07/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Jeremy Blosser, 10/07/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Thomas Orgis, 10/05/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Jeremy Blosser, 10/03/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Jeremy Blosser, 10/03/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 10/07/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Jeremy Blosser, 10/07/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 10/08/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Jeremy Blosser, 10/08/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 10/08/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Jeremy Blosser, 10/07/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 10/07/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.