sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement
- From: Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com>
- To: Vlad Glagolev <stealth AT tiberian.ru>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:37:35 -0300
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:59:42 +0300
Vlad Glagolev <stealth AT tiberian.ru> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:55:43 -0600
> Sukneet Basuta <sukneet AT gmail.com> wrote:
<...>
> > What ever happened to Vlad's new website? Using that as Source
> > Mage's website would be a step in the right direction imo.
>
> Vlad's new website is in-place, but the migration procedure to
> Jeremy's hardware is on hold because of some RL happening.
>
> So I still propose to set up temporary proxying from at least
> sourcemage.org and www.sourcemage.org hosts and/or change DNS records
> instead of wasting even more time.
+1.
> The same goes for bugzilla (bugs.sourcemage.ru), which is up-to-date,
> btw. I would easily backport our chili/redmine bug-reports to XML and
> import them into that bugzilla installation.
+1.
> I'm thinking that putting our primary node of repositories to gitlab
> is a bad idea and strategic mistake in comparison with supporting our
> own multi-mirror infrastructure (which all must be running Source
> Mage, not that RedHat, Fedora, Ubuntu or whatever you happily
> fire&forget).
+1. I agree requiring accounts on some random website is not a good
idea at all (although there might be workarounds).
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Ismael Luceno, 10/01/2015
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Jeremy Blosser, 10/03/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Thomas Orgis, 10/05/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Sukneet Basuta, 10/05/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Ismael Luceno, 10/07/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Kevin Monceaux, 10/07/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Jeremy Blosser, 10/07/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Thomas Orgis, 10/05/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Jeremy Blosser, 10/03/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Jeremy Blosser, 10/03/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 10/07/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Jeremy Blosser, 10/07/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 10/07/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.