sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release
- From: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 22:21:20 +0100
Am Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:04:16 +0100
schrieb Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>:
> Am Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:21:38 +0300
> schrieb Vlad Glagolev <stealth AT tiberian.ru>:
>
> > I've repackaged them right now, and they're being reuploaded. So the
> > tarballs will be available pretty soon, but you can download them from
> > my mirror directly:
>
> Splendit. The rebuild is now underway, next is upgrade to stable-rc,
Rebuild went through without issue. Upgrade to current stable-rc also
works. I just wonder about those notes:
Spell notices are repeated below:
-----------------------------------------------
Spell notices are repeated below:
texinfo:
regenerating the Info Database ...
196 info files listed
Finished
ca-certificates:
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/Wells_Fargo_Root_CA.pem
Broken symlink for a certificate at
/etc/ssl/certs/Entrust.net_Secure_Server_CA.pem
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/spi-ca-2003.pem
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/8f7b96c4.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/11a09b38.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/6adf0799.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/6e52cc39.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/7d3cd826.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/TDC_OCES_Root_CA.pem
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/ed524cf5.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at
/etc/ssl/certs/TC_TrustCenter_Universal_CA_III.pem
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/5ed36f99.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/RSA_Root_Certificate_1.pem
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/408e388a.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/1155c94b.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/ValiCert_Class_1_VA.pem
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/d537fba6.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/bcdd5959.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at
/etc/ssl/certs/Equifax_Secure_eBusiness_CA_2.pem
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/TDC_Internet_Root_CA.pem
Broken symlink for a certificate at
/etc/ssl/certs/Firmaprofesional_Root_CA.pem
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/f4996e82.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/cacert.org.pem
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/1df5ec47.0
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/ValiCert_Class_2_VA.pem
Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/ca.pem
You MUST remove the above broken symlinks
Otherwise SSL validation that use the directory may fail!
Is this really how it is supposed to work? I'm not new to these
messages, but it makes me wonder if it is nice to have SSL validation
broken that way (is it really?) without any funny custom symlinks added
by the admin.
Anyhow, I'm doing a rebuild to make sure, but it seems like the upgrade
path from 0.61 to 0.62 doesn't have blatantly obvious dealbreakers.
Is someone testing the 32 bit stuff?
Alrighty then,
Thomas
Attachment:
pgpbgo5p5IlxX.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-
[SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Vlad Glagolev, 02/17/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Vlad Glagolev, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Kevin Monceaux, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/20/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Vlad Glagolev, 02/21/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Thomas Orgis, 02/21/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Vlad Glagolev, 02/21/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Vlad Glagolev, 02/21/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Thomas Orgis, 02/22/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Jaka Kranjc, 02/22/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Thomas Orgis, 02/23/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Vlad Glagolev, 02/24/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Thomas Orgis, 02/24/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Vlad Glagolev, 02/21/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Vlad Glagolev, 02/22/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Vlad Glagolev, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.