sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release
- From: Vlad Glagolev <stealth AT tiberian.ru>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 10:09:37 +0300
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 22:21:20 +0100
Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org> wrote:
> Am Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:04:16 +0100
> schrieb Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>:
>
> > Am Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:21:38 +0300
> > schrieb Vlad Glagolev <stealth AT tiberian.ru>:
> >
> > > I've repackaged them right now, and they're being reuploaded. So the
> > > tarballs will be available pretty soon, but you can download them from
> > > my mirror directly:
> >
> > Splendit. The rebuild is now underway, next is upgrade to stable-rc,
>
> Rebuild went through without issue. Upgrade to current stable-rc also
> works. I just wonder about those notes:
>
> Spell notices are repeated below:
> -----------------------------------------------
> Spell notices are repeated below:
> texinfo:
> regenerating the Info Database ...
> 196 info files listed
> Finished
>
> ca-certificates:
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/Wells_Fargo_Root_CA.pem
> Broken symlink for a certificate at
> /etc/ssl/certs/Entrust.net_Secure_Server_CA.pem
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/spi-ca-2003.pem
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/8f7b96c4.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/11a09b38.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/6adf0799.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/6e52cc39.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/7d3cd826.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/TDC_OCES_Root_CA.pem
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/ed524cf5.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at
> /etc/ssl/certs/TC_TrustCenter_Universal_CA_III.pem
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/5ed36f99.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at
> /etc/ssl/certs/RSA_Root_Certificate_1.pem
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/408e388a.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/1155c94b.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/ValiCert_Class_1_VA.pem
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/d537fba6.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/bcdd5959.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at
> /etc/ssl/certs/Equifax_Secure_eBusiness_CA_2.pem
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/TDC_Internet_Root_CA.pem
> Broken symlink for a certificate at
> /etc/ssl/certs/Firmaprofesional_Root_CA.pem
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/f4996e82.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/cacert.org.pem
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/1df5ec47.0
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/ValiCert_Class_2_VA.pem
> Broken symlink for a certificate at /etc/ssl/certs/ca.pem
> You MUST remove the above broken symlinks
> Otherwise SSL validation that use the directory may fail!
>
> Is this really how it is supposed to work? I'm not new to these
> messages, but it makes me wonder if it is nice to have SSL validation
> broken that way (is it really?) without any funny custom symlinks added
> by the admin.
well, we could include the "fixing" command to the message to simplify
things:
find -L /etc/ssl/certs -type l -delete
but we shouldn't do some automated tasks for the SA.
>
> Anyhow, I'm doing a rebuild to make sure, but it seems like the upgrade
> path from 0.61 to 0.62 doesn't have blatantly obvious dealbreakers.
>
> Is someone testing the 32 bit stuff?
I'm going to perform 0.61-22 -> 0.62-rc upgrade on my i686 vm today,
will report back.
IIRC, sorcery rebuild will fail since 0.62-rc does not include those
readline 6.3 fixes for old spells. I'll merge them in at 0.62-stable
release stage.
>
>
> Alrighty then,
>
> Thomas
--
Vlad Glagolev <stealth AT tiberian.ru>
Attachment:
pgpAlfUc5CRta.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Vlad Glagolev, 02/17/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Vlad Glagolev, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Kevin Monceaux, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/20/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Vlad Glagolev, 02/21/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Thomas Orgis, 02/21/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Vlad Glagolev, 02/21/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Vlad Glagolev, 02/21/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Thomas Orgis, 02/22/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Jaka Kranjc, 02/22/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Thomas Orgis, 02/23/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Vlad Glagolev, 02/24/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Thomas Orgis, 02/24/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Vlad Glagolev, 02/21/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Vlad Glagolev, 02/22/2015
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release, Thomas Orgis, 02/23/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Vlad Glagolev, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2015
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Announcing stable-0.61 (20150217) chroot image release,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.