sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Bor Kraljič <pyrobor AT ver.si>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:18:48 +0200
On 14. of Oct 2011 9:32:12 David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org> wrote:
> On 10/14/2011 11:23 AM, Bor Kraljič wrote:
> > On 14. of Oct 2011 23:26:04 flux <flux AT sourcemage.org> wrote:
> >> Technically the discussion on this is a moot point, since we have an
> >> explicitly stated requirement that the description in DETAILS be
> >> wrapped
> >> to 80 characters:
> >>
> >> "The description must be aligned to 80 characters (no line should
> >> exceed
> >> 80th character)." [1]
> >>
> >> [1]: http://wiki.sourcemage.org/DETAILS
> >
> > hmm..
> > "This is the long description of the package. This should probably be
> > less than 24 lines as a guide, but not required. This *should* be
> > wrapped to 80 characters. The text ends with "EOF" on its own line,
> > beginning the in the leftmost column. " [1]
> >
> > And definition of "should" is based on [2] and [3] as just a
> > recommendation.
> >
> > So... Which one is the right one?
>
> Wrap all the lines to 80 characters, and update the documentation to
> indicate must.
Done and done.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/16/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Thomas Orgis, 10/16/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Bor Kraljič, 10/17/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
David Kowis, 10/17/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Remko van der Vossen, 10/17/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/17/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Bor Kraljič, 10/18/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
David Kowis, 10/17/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
flux, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Bor Kraljič, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
David Kowis, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Bor Kraljič, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, flux, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Kevin Monceaux, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Jaka Kranjc, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Kevin Monceaux, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Kevin Monceaux, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Bor Kraljič, 10/15/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Ladislav Hagara, 10/16/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Jaka Kranjc, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
David Kowis, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Bor Kraljič, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/16/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.