sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:32:12 -0500
On 10/14/2011 11:23 AM, Bor Kraljič wrote:
> On 14. of Oct 2011 23:26:04 flux <flux AT sourcemage.org> wrote:
>> Technically the discussion on this is a moot point, since we have an
>> explicitly stated requirement that the description in DETAILS be wrapped
>> to 80 characters:
>>
>> "The description must be aligned to 80 characters (no line should exceed
>> 80th character)." [1]
>>
>> [1]: http://wiki.sourcemage.org/DETAILS
> hmm..
> "This is the long description of the package. This should probably be less
> than 24 lines as a guide, but not required. This *should* be wrapped to 80
> characters. The text ends with "EOF" on its own line, beginning the in the
> leftmost column. " [1]
>
> And definition of "should" is based on [2] and [3] as just a
> recommendation.
>
> So... Which one is the right one?
Wrap all the lines to 80 characters, and update the documentation to
indicate must.
David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Thomas Orgis, 10/16/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/16/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Thomas Orgis, 10/16/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Bor Kraljič, 10/17/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
David Kowis, 10/17/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Remko van der Vossen, 10/17/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/17/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Bor Kraljič, 10/18/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
David Kowis, 10/17/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/16/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
flux, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Bor Kraljič, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
David Kowis, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Bor Kraljič, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, flux, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Kevin Monceaux, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Jaka Kranjc, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Kevin Monceaux, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Kevin Monceaux, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Bor Kraljič, 10/15/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Ladislav Hagara, 10/16/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Jaka Kranjc, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
David Kowis, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Bor Kraljič, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Thomas Orgis, 10/16/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.