sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>
- To: SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:26:04 +0900
Bor Kraljič (pyrobor AT ver.si) wrote [11.10.14 20:08]:
> Hi!
>
> DISCUSSION:
> Do we merge devel-long_desc_fix into master?
>
> WORK IN A BRANCH:
> With some help of scripting I managed to check all spells if long
> description
> wrap is needed. For checking and fixing I used quill (both of things are
> done
> by quills function check_description_wrap). I pushed changes into devel-
> long_desc_fix branch.
>
> CHANGES IN A BRANCH:
> All changes in that branch are only about long description getting cut 80
> columns.
>
> COMMENT:
> I arranged my opinions in pro and con categories:
> pro:
> * on some tty you can only see 80 columns and this helps to see whole long
> description
>
> con:
> * large number of changes (commits)
> * some long descriptions are cut pretty ugly. some are nice... but that is
> scripted... Way to much spells to do it manually.
> * this is from some point of view not important, cosmetic change
>
> DEADLINE
> I hope we will decide. Otherwise I will call for a vote or something on
> january 1st 2012.
>
> Kind regards,
> Bor
Technically the discussion on this is a moot point, since we have an
explicitly stated requirement that the description in DETAILS be wrapped
to 80 characters:
"The description must be aligned to 80 characters (no line should exceed
80th character)." [1]
[1]: http://wiki.sourcemage.org/DETAILS
--
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpibvaYO0h0s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Bor Kraljič, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Thomas Orgis, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Thomas Orgis, 10/16/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/16/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Thomas Orgis, 10/16/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Bor Kraljič, 10/17/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
David Kowis, 10/17/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Remko van der Vossen, 10/17/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/17/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Bor Kraljič, 10/18/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
David Kowis, 10/17/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/16/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Thomas Orgis, 10/16/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
flux, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Bor Kraljič, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
David Kowis, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Bor Kraljič, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, flux, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Kevin Monceaux, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Jaka Kranjc, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Kevin Monceaux, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Kevin Monceaux, 10/14/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells, Bor Kraljič, 10/15/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Jaka Kranjc, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
David Kowis, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Bor Kraljič, 10/14/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] long description wrap in spells,
Thomas Orgis, 10/14/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.