sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion)
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion)
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:40:06 -0700
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 05:03:42 +0200 (CEST)
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik <ruskie AT codemages.net> wrote:
> :2009-08-28T21:03:David Kowis:
>
> > Regarding all of the above emails:
> >
> > An unnecessary restriction on what the developer must do.
> >
> > They write code that conforms to bash, and we have few restrictions,
> > thus allowing people to do what suits them best. They are the ones
> > doing the work.
> >
> > I see no reason to force additional standards upon them.
>
> Agreed
From my discussion with Vlad on IRC that prompted this, I believe he is
wanting to clean up/modify our current formatting standards. We already
have some requirements on how our developers write spells and he (and
others) have changes they would like made. Instead of talking about it
in IRC where it gets lost I (and others) suggested he bring it up on
the ML for discussion.
Some of his suggestions are to add requirements, others are to remove
requirements (e.g. remove the spacing requrement in DEPENDS for trailing
"\" and "&&" as shown in http://www.sourcemage.org/DEPENDS, before the
current wiki mangled the formatting).
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Vlad Glagolev, 08/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
David Kowis, 08/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 08/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Eric Sandall, 08/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Jeremy Blosser, 08/29/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Robin Cook, 08/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Jeremy Blosser, 08/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Eric Sandall, 08/28/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Jaka Kranjc, 08/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 08/28/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Mathieu L., 08/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
David Kowis, 08/28/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.