sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion)
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: Source Mage Discussion <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion)
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:03:09 -0500
Vlad Glagolev wrote:
> So what do we have now, and what would we want to.
>
> We are big enough, and freedom is freedom, yes.
> But I think such standartisation is needed just to keep some thing in sync.
> Well-formed code matters.
>
> Look at the other projects, they have some coding style guides, etc. for
> new developers involved in production process, and it's really good.
>
> OpenBSD: http://www.openbsd.org/checklist.html
> WebKit: http://webkit.org/coding/coding-style.html
> Python: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
>
> These are well-known, and of course there are many more, but probably we
> should also have one?
>
> Comments?
>
Regarding all of the above emails:
An unnecessary restriction on what the developer must do.
They write code that conforms to bash, and we have few restrictions,
thus allowing people to do what suits them best. They are the ones doing
the work.
I see no reason to force additional standards upon them.
David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-
[SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Vlad Glagolev, 08/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
David Kowis, 08/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 08/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Eric Sandall, 08/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Jeremy Blosser, 08/29/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Robin Cook, 08/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Jeremy Blosser, 08/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Eric Sandall, 08/28/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Jaka Kranjc, 08/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 08/28/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Mathieu L., 08/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
David Kowis, 08/28/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.