sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion)
- From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion)
- Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:48:16 -0500
I disagree with making cosmetic changes just to suit someones idea of
how they think code should be formatted that might not fit how someone
else thinks code should be formatted.
Most of the code I see is readable even if it is not in the format that
I would use.
CuZnDragon
Robin Cook
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Vlad Glagolev, 08/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
David Kowis, 08/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 08/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Eric Sandall, 08/28/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Jeremy Blosser, 08/29/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Robin Cook, 08/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Jeremy Blosser, 08/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Eric Sandall, 08/28/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Jaka Kranjc, 08/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 08/28/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Mathieu L., 08/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion),
David Kowis, 08/28/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.