sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion)

From: Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik <ruskie AT codemages.net>
To: Source Mage Discussion <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 05:03:42 +0200 (CEST)

:2009-08-28T21:03:David Kowis:

> Regarding all of the above emails:
>
> An unnecessary restriction on what the developer must do.
>
> They write code that conforms to bash, and we have few restrictions,
> thus allowing people to do what suits them best. They are the ones doing
> the work.
>
> I see no reason to force additional standards upon them.

Agreed

--
Andraž ruskie Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games/Xorg grimoire guru
Re-Alpine Coordinator http://sourceforge.net/projects/re-alpine/
Geek/Hacker/Tinker

Be sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth.

[SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Vlad Glagolev, 08/28/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), David Kowis, 08/28/2009
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 08/28/2009
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Eric Sandall, 08/28/2009
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Jeremy Blosser, 08/29/2009
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Robin Cook, 08/29/2009
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Jaka Kranjc, 08/29/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] The Great E-mails: part 5 (Conclusion), Mathieu L., 08/29/2009