sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:22:16 -0800
Forgot a step. :)
Quoting "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>:
I see two options, in the order of my preference:Maybe call it locate, or findutils-locate (I prefer the former).
1. Use PROVIDES
Make a separate location spell that only installs locate from
findutils (same SOURCE) and have it provide LOCATEHave locate, mlocate, and slocate all CONFLICT with each other
Have mlocate (and slocate, if we get it) provide LOCATE
Have findutils optionally depend on locate (systems can exist without it :))
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?, Jeremy Blosser, 11/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?, Kevin Monceaux, 11/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?, Eric Sandall, 11/17/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
flux, 11/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
Kevin Monceaux, 11/12/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
flux, 11/12/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?, Kevin Monceaux, 11/12/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
flux, 11/12/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?,
Kevin Monceaux, 11/12/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?, Eric Sandall, 11/17/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anyone interested in a mlocate spell?, Kevin Monceaux, 11/11/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.