sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz>
- To: "sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:32:31 +0200
Howdy all,
wondering what is new with glibc and new headers.
We still have glibc 2.4 in test grimoire.
Current version is 2.6.1. In devel git we have 2.5.
We discussed in Jun that glibc 2.5 should go into test [1].
We still use glibc with linux-libc-headers 2.6.12.0 (they are from 2005,
unmaintained).
New applications need new headers, for example new hal fails with our
glibc because of stale headers [2].
[1] https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2007-June/016997.html
[2] http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-support/2007-May/062888.html
--
Ladislav Hagara
-
[SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
Ladislav Hagara, 08/10/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
Treeve Jelbert, 08/10/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 08/10/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
David Brown, 08/10/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
Ladislav Hagara, 08/12/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
Arwed von Merkatz, 08/12/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
Thomas Orgis, 08/14/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1, Arwed von Merkatz, 08/15/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
Thomas Orgis, 08/14/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
Arwed von Merkatz, 08/12/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
Ladislav Hagara, 08/12/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
David Brown, 08/10/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 08/10/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.5/2.6.1,
Treeve Jelbert, 08/10/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.