sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:52:32 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Treeve Jelbert wrote:
<snip>
> we could move the really critical spells to a separate CRITICAL section and
> put some warnings in the section
A simple list would be anything in smgl/basesystem/DEPENDS. Then we
don't have to go out of our way to mark any packages as they are, IMO,
already 'marked'.
I agree that we shouldn't use a technological solution to limit access,
especially to test (we already limit access to stable-rc and stable,
which is what you should be using if you don't want breakage :)). Also
keep in mind that mistakes do happen (e.g. copying the wrong files, and
not the ones you tested, and committing those). I have (and continue to
make) mistakes, as anyone who reads the reviews can see. ;)
- -sandalle
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEtnpQHXt9dKjv3WERAiVFAJ94UhCA/nriS6NkbaOm1exoy+gdKgCfXdO+
sZMUVOv5FD4k8brYGJsY/M0=
=TnEI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells, Arjan Bouter, 07/13/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells, Jeremy Blosser, 07/13/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells, seth, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Arjan Bouter, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Andrew, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Treeve Jelbert, 07/13/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells, Eric Sandall, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Treeve Jelbert, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Flavien Bridault, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Arjan Bouter, 07/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Jeremy Blosser, 07/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells, Flavien Bridault, 07/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Jeremy Blosser, 07/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells, Jeremy Blosser, 07/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Jeremy Blosser, 07/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Arjan Bouter, 07/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Andrew, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 07/13/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] restricting access to important spells, Jeremy Blosser, 07/13/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.