Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my
  • Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 10:21:45 -0500

On May 07, Eric Sandall [eric AT sandall.us] wrote:
> Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> <snip>
> > ruskie pointed out apprentice was missing from the glossary, I'll add that
> > there but I'm not entirely sure how to define it if we aren't expecting to
> > keep a standing devel grimoire. I guess we will still have devel for
> > sorcery and cauldron... maybe we can just keep the apprentice/mentor
> > relationship going for those that want it and have them submit patches
> > instead of directly to devel. Or we could let them do their own WIP devel
> > branches.
>
> I'd say let them submit patches or, if using git, let them publish their
> own grimoire with their changes which their mentor can pull from, or
> they can use the devel branch in our git repo and their mentor can
> cherry-pick from there.

Arwed is become more and more convinced we won't *have* a standing devel
branch in git (or whatever scm). We'll have per-WIP temp branches when
needed. Of course, they could have access to create and commit to these
just like anyone else.

Attachment: pgp5f7qGcxUDN.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page