sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my
- Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 22:35:06 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On May 06, Eric Sandall [eric AT sandall.us] wrote:
<snip>
>> Archwizard just sounds cool (and I wanted to use sage for Tome ;)).
>> <snip>
>
> I was going to suggest just 'arch' to keep it shorter and be less likely
> to confuse people with the similarity to 'wizard', but what about 'archon'
> instead (yes, it's more Greek and less D&D, but where in D&D did 'guru'
> come from anyway)? Arwed, do you have any thoughts?
Archon would work as well. I believe 'guru' comes from UNIX philosophy:
n. [UNIX] An expert. Implies not only wizard skill but also a history of
being a knowledge resource for others. Less often, used (with a
qualifier) for other experts on other systems, as in `VMS guru'. See
source of all good bits.
- -sandalle
[0] http://www.clueless.com/jargon3.0.0/guru.html
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEXYcKHXt9dKjv3WERAlBPAKCbvxOI61C53AADFkbXNOhRZC2vuwCfTTGA
MTuro2Htlv9AnSgEo/6AtWM=
=vRVj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Eric Sandall, 05/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Eric Sandall, 05/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my, Mathieu L., 05/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Eric Sandall, 05/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my, Jeremy Blosser, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Eric Sandall, 05/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my, Matt Donovan (Kitche), 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Eric Sandall, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Robin Cook, 05/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my, Karsten Behrmann, 05/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my, Juuso Alasuutari, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Eric Sandall, 05/06/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.