sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my
- Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 17:08:32 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> To pull a few of these threads into one...
<snip>
> To resolve that question and get on with things, I'm suggesting we add a
> few more cloaks/title so that basically each component has a general
> developer and a lead developer title available, and then we can say that
> you can be listed on the developer page and cloaked using whichever title
> you want from among the components you have access to. Karsten can
> basically manage our cloaks for us now (and is one of the ones asking for
> this ;P) so it shouldn't be an issue with freenode. Proposed cloaks:
I would propose the two following changes:
> general dev lead dev
> ----------- --------
> generic : mage -> elder
>
> cauldron : wizard -> warlock
> grimoire : guru -> ??? sage?
archwizard
> sorcery : wizard -> warlock
> tome : ??? scribe? -> ??? bard?
sage
Sage usually holds knowledge for others to reference/ask about, which
would fit more the Tome Team (documentation, website, forums, etc.) to
me. :)
Archwizard just sounds cool (and I wanted to use sage for Tome ;)).
<snip>
- -sandalle
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEXTqAHXt9dKjv3WERAjbsAJ9wdZqA4YXDL8HLfkGuu72mxeSzgwCgjQ4Z
OR0d6dq7YK8U9m3LqwmH6hg=
=AbTc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Eric Sandall, 05/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Eric Sandall, 05/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my, Mathieu L., 05/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Eric Sandall, 05/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my, Jeremy Blosser, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Eric Sandall, 05/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my, Matt Donovan (Kitche), 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Eric Sandall, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Robin Cook, 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] policy docs, developer lists, jargon, oh my,
Eric Sandall, 05/06/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.