sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote
- From: George sherwood <pilot AT beernabeer.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 14:17:55 -0400
On Fri, 5 May 2006 13:06:59 -0500
"Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org> wrote:
> I know Eric is busy with finals, so as APL I'm calling for a vote on
> the below amendment, as a more specific version of the suggested
> amendment proposed earlier today.
>
> Per the new policy[0], Leads should reply to the ML with signed +/- 1
> or 0 votes. Other developers may vote as well, but only Lead votes
> are binding. The vote will last until 1PM CDT May 12th, or until a
> majority approves or rejects it, whichever comes first. This vote
> affects the voting policy, so any lead or other developer can move
> for a veto at the end of the vote, regardless of the results.
>
> [0] - Not yet on the web site, but we're working on having it there
> today.
Is there some reason this has to be done so quickly? We only found out
the results of the Organization Policy yesterday and now this. We
haven't figured out what is a lead developer IAW with the new policy, so
now only the leads under the old policy have counted votes. Not sure
this is a great way to start the new organization. I don't see the
reason for rushing this vote.
George
--
George Sherwood
Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/04/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jaka Kranjc, 05/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote,
Juuso Alasuutari, 05/04/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote,
Eric Sandall, 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, David C. Haley, 05/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote,
Juuso Alasuutari, 05/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote,
Eric Sandall, 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jaka Kranjc, 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, George sherwood, 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, David Kowis, 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Andrew Stitt, 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Arwed von Merkatz, 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Eric Sandall, 05/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jason Flatt, 05/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jaka Kranjc, 05/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote,
Eric Sandall, 05/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote, Jaka Kranjc, 05/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote,
Eric Sandall, 05/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Results for Organization Policy vote,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/04/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.