sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote
- From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:04:13 -0600
The little bit I have worked with SVN I haven't cared for it. Can't
really compare it to the others as I have not tried them. But I am
willing to test the ones that are on the short list and then vote for
the one I like working with most.
CuZnDragon
Robin Cook
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 12:57 +0100, Pieter Lenaerts wrote:
> I'd like to volounteer to advocate for subversion for the grimoire. I
> don't know how other teams work so I don't know if they would like a
> distributed system, but for our grimoire, distributed == HELL (we could
> just set up a server as central point, ending us up with a centralized
> system anyway)
> If other teams need distributed, I'm sure they can find one to their
> liking.
>
> only point against subversion I can think of right now:
>
> subversion does not remember history across branches:
> 1..N changes to devel -> merge to test -> leaves only the merge in
> test's history. imo this is not a problem: we keep our own changelogs in
> HISTORY, of which we will find the diffs in the logs of devel branch.
>
> I thought I had more issues, but I don't atm (the ones I had were plain
> wrong). I'm sure, dear sm-discuss, that you know stuff :)
>
> please fire away with good arguments, so no "svn is crap", but "svn is
> crap because..." :)
>
> anyone who likes can play around in my svn sandbox. just ask me for a
> login and I will provide you one asap (not open to the world, sorry, my
> uni work is on it too)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SVN as p4 replacement
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SVN as p4 replacement, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 03/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SVN as p4 replacement, Seth Woolley, 03/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SVN as p4 replacement, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 03/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SVN as p4 replacement, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SVN as p4 replacement, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 03/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote, Andrew, 03/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote, Pieter Lenaerts, 03/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote, Andrew, 03/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 03/20/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote, Andrew, 03/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote, Robin Cook, 03/17/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.