sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 14:36:56 -0500
Andrew, Let me ask differently because we're wondering around I think. Here's the scenario for central repository model:
So, we have various degrees of support for working copies, private branches, public branches and tags. Arguably, "private branch" here is a stretch, but as I described it can be done and works. In this scenario, which is shamelessly tailored to Subversion, what's missing in your opinion? Sergey. |
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, John Harding, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
George Sherwood, 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Ladislav Hagara, 11/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Maurizio Boriani, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew, 11/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Maurizio Boriani, 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Karsten Behrmann, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 11/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.