sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
- From: Maurizio Boriani <baux AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:01:22 +0100
- Resent-date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:04:13 +0100
- Resent-from: Maurizio Boriani <baux AT sourcemage.org>
- Resent-to: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
On 2005-11-03 07:02:25 +0100 Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org> wrote:
[...]
agree to Totally Free Distro :))
also agree with z-rejected stuff
Switch our SCM to something(s) other than perforce for everything.
I propose gnu arch[0] :)
becouse:
0) every developer has his own revision history locally (this permit to work on
previus revisions without network :) )
1) could be used for incremental grimoires and sorcery distribution.
2) It's totally free and under fsf copyright
3) could be used with or without a central repository.
4) it's your fried :))
bye
[0]: http://www.gnuarch.org/
--
Maurizio Boriani
GPG key: 0xCC0FBF8F
=> E429 A37C 5259 763C 9DEE FC8B 5D61 C796 CC0F BF8F <=
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Robert Figura, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, John Harding, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
George Sherwood, 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Ladislav Hagara, 11/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Maurizio Boriani, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew, 11/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Maurizio Boriani, 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew, 11/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Andrew, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?,
Karsten Behrmann, 11/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.