sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:24:57 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eric Sandall wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David Kowis wrote:
>
>>> Do we really *need* LVM for 1.0? I don't know how difficult that'll be
>>> to implement, but it's not on there now. Also, the RAID stuff needs more
>>> work. Other than that we'll probably make it :)
Or I could think a bit more before replying and realize that this is
nearly the end of September and not the beginning anymore ... :)
>
>
> LVM would be nice and, at the time the RoadMap was made, decided that
> we want it on our 1.0. LVM and RAID are becoming more popular for
> 'normal' installs (i.e. not just servers). What do others think? I'd
> like to have LVM and RAID working well for 1.0, but if that means
> another delay?
>
For some reason I didn't compute dates right in my head. October 13th is
only 4 weeks away, not however far off I thought it was.
We've not yet even released 0.9.5 as a stable release. And after
discussing with the team on IRC about it for a while, we feel that about
a month for stable ISO's to float around the community is probably a
good idea.
Right now, the plan is the following:
0.9.5: replace 0.9.3, get it out soon
0.9.6: add most small features delayed by 0.9.5 release
0.9.7: add RAID and LVM, use cast & resurrect
0.9.8: soak time, give some time to really polish the edges
Judging by the releases we'd like to get out, we really need about 4
more months or so. We don't know how difficult LVM will be. I don't know
anything about LVM. The RAID option needs a bit more polishing.
I hate to say it, but I think we should push the 1.0 back until we're
100% done with the ISO. Also, the ISO may take longer to release than
anticipated. We really cannot see much farther than the the next 2
versions, when it comes to release dates.
- --
David Kowis
ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
SourceMage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
PS: sandalle, sorry forgot to send to the ML too ;)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFDMxMZtgErhgxHMHsRAtpGAJ4k2/OAiUNZsRp9PApdB9lhsPEZTgCfcb01
9l3wdnCMFYAtMuYp6HiNLvU=
=4gP0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] Team Progress,
Eric Sandall, 09/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress,
Andrew, 09/21/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Eric Sandall, 09/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress,
David Kowis, 09/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress,
Eric Sandall, 09/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, David Brown, 09/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 09/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress,
David Kowis, 09/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 09/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress,
Eric Sandall, 09/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 09/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress,
Eric Sandall, 09/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress,
Arwed von Merkatz, 09/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress,
Eric Sandall, 09/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Arwed von Merkatz, 09/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress,
Eric Sandall, 09/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress,
Andrew, 09/21/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.