Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress
  • Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:27:02 -0500

On Sep 22, Eric Sandall [eric AT sandall.us] wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David Kowis wrote:
> > Do we really *need* LVM for 1.0? I don't know how difficult that'll be
> > to implement, but it's not on there now. Also, the RAID stuff needs more
> > work. Other than that we'll probably make it :)
>
> LVM would be nice and, at the time the RoadMap was made, decided that
> we want it on our 1.0. LVM and RAID are becoming more popular for
> 'normal' installs (i.e. not just servers). What do others think? I'd
> like to have LVM and RAID working well for 1.0, but if that means
> another delay?

For what it's worth at least half the people I recommend SMGL to ask "does
it support LVM?" as one of their first couple questions. It's popular
enough among serious SAs that I think it's worth making sure we have it.

Attachment: pgpTxA3TTEvk3.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page