Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>]

On Sep 22, Eric Sandall [eric AT sandall.us] wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David Kowis wrote:
> > Do we really *need* LVM for 1.0? I don't know how difficult that'll be
> > to implement, but it's not on there now. Also, the RAID stuff needs more
> > work.  Other than that we'll probably make it :)
> 
> LVM would be nice and, at the time the RoadMap was made, decided that
> we want it on our 1.0. LVM and RAID are becoming more popular for
> 'normal' installs (i.e. not just servers). What do others think? I'd
> like to have LVM and RAID working well for 1.0, but if that means
> another delay?

For what it's worth at least half the people I recommend SMGL to ask "does
it support LVM?" as one of their first couple questions.  It's popular
enough among serious SAs that I think it's worth making sure we have it.

Attachment: pgpTxA3TTEvk3.pgp
Description: PGP signature