sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress

From: David Brown <dmlb2000 AT gmail.com>
To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:40:02 -0700

LVM would be nice and, at the time the RoadMap was made, decided that
we want it on our 1.0. LVM and RAID are becoming more popular for
'normal' installs (i.e. not just servers). What do others think? I'd
like to have LVM and RAID working well for 1.0, but if that means
another delay?

If this is supposed to be the 'do anything on anything ' iso then I would think it's worth the wait to make it work.

- David Brown

[SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Eric Sandall, 09/21/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Andrew, 09/21/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Eric Sandall, 09/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, David Kowis, 09/21/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Eric Sandall, 09/22/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, David Brown, 09/22/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 09/22/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, David Kowis, 09/22/2005
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 09/23/2005
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Eric Sandall, 09/24/2005
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 09/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Arwed von Merkatz, 09/22/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Eric Sandall, 09/22/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] Team Progress, Arwed von Merkatz, 09/22/2005