Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David Kowis wrote:
> Do we really *need* LVM for 1.0? I don't know how difficult that'll be
> to implement, but it's not on there now. Also, the RAID stuff needs more
> work.  Other than that we'll probably make it :)

LVM would be nice and, at the time the RoadMap was made, decided that
we want it on our 1.0. LVM and RAID are becoming more popular for
'normal' installs (i.e. not just servers). What do others think? I'd
like to have LVM and RAID working well for 1.0, but if that means
another delay?

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDMt7DHXt9dKjv3WERAhO2AKCQt2aJlLQN+VSxN9juXgsbvMcqpgCfZEfl
d54mcEpWE5Q2Zg6obhbMHzQ=
=9FH4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----