sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:13:12 -0700
Is there a way to ensure that spells always link against the newer
library and not the older one? I think if thats possible then having
the 0.9.7-so spell would be preferable and avoid breakage. On updates
it could up-trigger anything thats still linked against it or dispel itself
if nothing is left. Sort of a self-healing type of thing.
Also, wrt to ordering, openssl-0.9.7-so could cast before openssl,
and openssl can just be careful in PRE_INSTALL not to remove the 0.9.7
libs. Theres a few possible solutions for that. Motivation being to
minimize the time where the 0.9.7 so is missing.
-Andrew
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:03:16PM -0400, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I can't test anything but here's an idea. What if we create a
> `openssl-0.9.7-so'
> spell that *only* installs libcrypto-0.9.7.so and libssl-0.9.7.so? We can
> make
> it an optional dependency of OpenSSL spell until next ISO release for
> example.
> This way, old spells may (testing required) remain functional until they're
> recast, while all new and recast spells would use OpenSSL 0.9.8 includes and
> so-s and will not need 0.9.7 so-s. A dirty hack of course, but it may work.
>
> Sergey.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt at sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | acedit at armory.com |
|Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgp73e4FZMShz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion, Seth Alan Woolley, 09/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion, Eric Sandall, 09/12/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion, Andrew, 09/12/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion, Andrew, 09/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OpenSSL 0.9.8 upgrade suggestion, Seth Alan Woolley, 09/11/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.