Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
  • Cc: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?
  • Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:43:09 -0700 (PDT)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
Quoting Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>:

If possible I'd rather have David Brown's gcc changes[0] in along with
this, once he's done testing them and if Arwed approves. ;)

I'd rather not deal with that right now, sorry. Merging stuff from devel/gnu
into test/gnu is non-trivial already because they lived separate lives for a
while. I'm done with the merge itself, and testing this stuff right now... I
can't test it for all scenarios right away, and I can't test gnats because it
doesn't work on amd64.

If those changes are a no-go or we'd rather put them into devel
/after/ the current gcc 4.0 goes to test I'm fine with that as well. I
/would/ like some (I'll have one of my chroots do this) testing of a
current gcc 3.4 -> gcc 4.0 system update.

I'd prefer this plan.

So would I as it'd be safest. :) Though I really like the idea of all
the gcc's in their 'proper' spots, that can wait.

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDFJqvHXt9dKjv3WERAt4zAKC805XzjmdqgVmxHbyU4AWYQDI+lwCdHth2
O7DdwG3iCCqz++f4hcTVxaY=
=sxaq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page