Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>]

On Jul 19, Sergey A. Lipnevich [sergey AT optimaltec.com] wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 17:16 -0500, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> 
> > Yeah, I'm sure that's the kind of good thing Sergey is after by separating
> > these.
> 
> Actually, that root certificate thing came quite out of the blue :-).
> NSS was separated because too many other spells started needing it.
> Installing either Firefox or Mozilla for them was a headache.
> 
> > It sounds like this works for people... is anyone concerned this might
> > introduce a problem?  I'm a little leery or something that just looks for 
> > a
> > certain .so in a certain place, it seems it could end up with other 
> > library
> > dependencies that aren't fulfilled correctly or something.  But if people
> > think this works, maybe it's the thing to do.  Sergey, what do you think?
> 
> In /usr/bin/firefox, if we add /usr/lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH, would it
> load the module without a symlink?

Tried that already, doesn't work.

Attachment: pgpzwB92LLyTu.pgp
Description: PGP signature