Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable 0.1 Notes and Last Call

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable 0.1 Notes and Last Call
  • Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:19:05 -0500

On Jul 19, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) [jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org] wrote:
> On Jul 19, Sergey A. Lipnevich [sergey AT optimaltec.com] wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 17:16 -0500, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah, I'm sure that's the kind of good thing Sergey is after by
> > > separating
> > > these.
> >
> > Actually, that root certificate thing came quite out of the blue :-).
> > NSS was separated because too many other spells started needing it.
> > Installing either Firefox or Mozilla for them was a headache.
> >
> > > It sounds like this works for people... is anyone concerned this might
> > > introduce a problem? I'm a little leery or something that just looks
> > > for a
> > > certain .so in a certain place, it seems it could end up with other
> > > library
> > > dependencies that aren't fulfilled correctly or something. But if
> > > people
> > > think this works, maybe it's the thing to do. Sergey, what do you
> > > think?
> >
> > In /usr/bin/firefox, if we add /usr/lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH, would it
> > load the module without a symlink?
>
> Tried that already, doesn't work.

Moving this discussion back to the bug itself, if you're interested add
yourself to the cc list:

http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9208

Looks like it's going to have to be the symlink, the design cares about the
specific location.

Attachment: pgp48bNQKU5Rz.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page