sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 08:11:27 -0700
Quoting Flavien Bridault <f.bridault AT fra.net>:
> Hi people,
>
> I know that it is a bit late to discuss about our vote processing, in
> this period of hard votes. But the point that I want to deal with can
> still be achieved.
>
> I indeed realized something, sorry if it comes very early. The anonymous
> is in fact a good thing, because in this way, people are not influenced
> during the vote period. And there will be no more threat against
> families, friends, dogs, ravens, etc... ;-)
> But I wonder, and some people already asked, how can we verify the vote
> since if it is anonymous ?? I obviously have a entire trust for our
> Evermost High Priest ;-) But he might not be PL forever, and anyway, I
> already heard some people saying that votes will be faked and things
> like that :-/ I really wish we don't fall into such debates, which will
> surely occur if we keep this process as is.
>
> My proposal would be to keep the anonymous vote during the vote period,
> and then publish the list in the same time as the vote result. This way,
> there will be no possible dispute. Obviously, this will assume that
> anyone will know who voted for who after the vote, but this is the only
> way I see. Anyway, did we really need to keep such secrets ? Are we not
> enough responsible to assume our own vote ?
>
> Thanks for your time :)
I already send a list of those who voted to the list with each vote account[0]
according to our voting procedure[1]. I'm also thinking of adding a
requirement
of a validly GPG signed (or encrypted if you prefer) e-mail with your vote,
but
I was going to wait until the flurry of votes are over so we don't change
midstride.
Currently forged votes are a little difficult anyways because I reply to the
guru's address with their vote listed saying, "Noted, thanks. :)". So if you
get a response with that and you didn't vote, let me know.
(also, if somehow you didn't get a response to your vote let me know).
-sandalle
[0] https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2005-April/010618.html
[1] http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=Team+Lead+Voting+Process
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Flavien Bridault, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
David Kowis, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Mathieu L., 05/13/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing, Eric Sandall, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Mathieu L., 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Eric Sandall, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Flavien Bridault, 05/13/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing, Eric Sandall, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Flavien Bridault, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Duane Malcolm, 05/13/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing, Eric Sandall, 05/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing, David Kowis, 05/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Ladislav Hagara, 05/16/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 05/16/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing, Flavien Bridault, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
David Kowis, 05/13/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.