sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:45:44 -0500
Quoting Flavien Bridault <f.bridault AT fra.net>:
Hi people,The point of requiring that the votes were anonymous is so that others were not
My proposal would be to keep the anonymous vote during the vote period,
and then publish the list in the same time as the vote result. This way,
there will be no possible dispute. Obviously, this will assume that
anyone will know who voted for who after the vote, but this is the only
way I see. Anyway, did we really need to keep such secrets ? Are we not
enough responsible to assume our own vote ?
influenced by someones vote. I understand your concern and I find it alarming
that people would resort to forging votes, or even consider forging votes.
Perhaps another alternative would be to require votes to be gpg signed and
verified that way? I don't think requiring a GPG signature for the email that
the vote's on is necessarily a bad thing. It's not hard to acquire a gpg key.
Too bad we don't have the channel for the signing anymore. Perhaps we could add
it to the website?
Back to the topic, I think you've got a very valid point and it will not affect
the current voting process, nor will disclosing the results at the end affect
the votes of people during the election. It might displease some people, "Why
did you vote for him, I thought you were going to vote for me !?!" But that
happens. I'm in favor of the disclosure after the votes have ended. I think
it's a good thing, and I don't think it will hurt, since before we used to tell
the list anyway.
If the disclosure thing proves to be unliked, then I'd reccommend that we go to
gpg signing of the votes.
perhaps the process should go:
1. submit a key to the PL that you'll use to sign your vote with
2. sign (encrypt if desired) the vote email you're sending when voting occurs
Now that I think about it, I like the gpg signature thingy better than the
disclosure :)
Some things to think about during this especially lively voting session :)
(a little campainging :) )
Vote for me for ISO team lead :D
An ISO Team Lead Candidate,
David Kowis
--
One login to rule them all, one login to find them. One login to bring them all,
and in the web bind them.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Attachment:
pgpuJqafEDmQf.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Flavien Bridault, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
David Kowis, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Mathieu L., 05/13/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing, Eric Sandall, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Mathieu L., 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Eric Sandall, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Flavien Bridault, 05/13/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing, Eric Sandall, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Flavien Bridault, 05/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Duane Malcolm, 05/13/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing, Eric Sandall, 05/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing, David Kowis, 05/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
Ladislav Hagara, 05/16/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 05/16/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Anonymous vote processing,
David Kowis, 05/13/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.