sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT]
- From: Pierre-François Gomez <pf.gomez AT free.fr>
- To: Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT]
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:39:15 +0100
Hello,
Just giving my 2c while stumbling upon your discussion, here :
Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault AT sourcemage.org> writes:
> However, the installer contains the following lines (which seems to be
> correct):
>
> mkdir -p "${TARGET}/tmp" "${TARGET}/var/tmp" && chmod a+rwxt
> "${TARGET}/tmp" "${TARGET}/var/tmp" &&
>
> How the directory can have suid/sgid bit then?
Theoretically, it can if there's a umask lurking around at the time of
the mkdir. In practice, i don't see how it would happen during install
:)
My point is : wouldn't it be less error-prone if the second line were
just reading :
chmod 1777 "${TARGET}/tmp" "${TARGET}/var/tmp" ?
HTH
-- Pierre-François Gomez
-
[SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3),
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 03/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3), Seth Alan Woolley, 03/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT],
Damien Mascord, 03/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT],
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 03/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT],
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT],
Ladislav Hagara, 03/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT],
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 03/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT], Pierre-François Gomez, 03/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT],
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 03/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT],
Ladislav Hagara, 03/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT], Eduardo Tongson, 03/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT], Damien Mascord, 03/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT],
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT],
David Kowis, 03/24/2005
- [SM-Discuss] What to do with the old installer (was: x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT]), Karsten Behrmann, 03/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3) [INSTALL REPORT],
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 03/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3), David Kowis, 03/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3),
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 03/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86/ppc/x86-64 test ISO available (test3), sergey, 03/24/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.