Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>]

There is the grimoire changelog, that would seem to me to be a good
place to put notices like this.

On Sun, 2005-13-02 at 20:33 +0100, Flavien Bridault wrote:
> Le Samedi 12 Février 2005 23:23, Eric Sandall a écrit :
> > Quoting Flavien Bridault <f.bridault AT fra.net>:
> > > Mmmm.... Yes it should be better... You're obviously right... But you
> > > wanted to say PRE_BUILD, don't you ? Since afaik PREPARE no longer 
> > > exists
> > > in BUILD_API 2 ??
> > >
> > > How can I do this properly ?? Ask the user if is right for updating 
> > > udev,
> > > with
> > > default to no ?? How can I exit the spell properly ??
> >
> > PREPARE exists in build_api 2.
> >
> > You could do this in PREPARE:
> >
> > message  "${MESSAGE_COLOR}<long warning>${DEFAULT_COLOR}"       &&
> > config_query  UDEV_UPDATE  "Do you still wish to continue?"  n  &&
> >
> > if  [  "$UDEV_UPDATE"  ==  "n"  ];  then
> >   return  1
> > fi
> >
> > -sandalle
> >
> > --
> > Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> > eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
> > http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> > http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> 
> Just come back from the week-end...
> 
> I modified the udev spell once again and did this stuff. It is a bit too 
> late 
> for people who use test grimoire, but it should be useful for people who 
> use 
> stable grimoire.
> 
> Sorry for the question about PREPARE file, but it seems it was not obvious 
> for 
> everyone (according to a discussion on #sourcemage...). Some people use 
> CONFIGURE to do this kind of stuff (that should not work, but it works, see 
> kde spells for instance ;-) ).
> 
> I wonder if such warnings should not become a rule when big changes happen 
> in 
> a spell. Maybe a notice in guru handbook should be added ??? We can even 
> imagine that a sorcery, or a grimoire function could simplify this ?? Any 
> suggestion about this ??
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part