sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Flavien Bridault <f.bridault AT fra.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [smgl] Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:44:00 +0100
Well I just commited the warning and the config file example...
The last changes of udev spell highlight some problems for me...
I really appreciate the help of general gurus, however, I would like to be
informed of the changes they made in my section. Yes, you read well, disk
section is maintained !!! ;-p
I think there are enough bugs in others sections (1 in disk, about 230 in the
rest of the grimoire), and especially in the unmaintained sections, to give
enough work for all general gurus ;-p
Well, I didn't have to complain before... In general, nothing has caused
problems. Why this time ??
*Three* general gurus have modified the udev spell in three days :
- updated the spell to 0.51, ok....
- modified udev.rules to match new version, ok....
- then first bug, but quickly corrected by a general guru, almost
before
reporting... Well that was not too serious...
(http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8215)
- second bug then, corrected by your disk section maintainer (thanks
to Paul
Mahon) http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8216
But the most serious problem is that users *have not been informed* of the
config files changes !!! Some of them complain on IRC of having spent hours
to find why they have troubles with their boxes !!! A simple warning message,
as I just did, should have been sufficient...
I find this is really not very serious to made such a change on a so
important
spell, without any notification... Please stop think that *everybody* read
the ML or IRC channels...
Well I hope I didn't made all general gurus my ennemies, all I want to have,
is more communication. It is true that I'm not all time on IRC, but you can
still mail me. Don't forget that when you made changes that cause a bug, this
is the section maintainer who have to correct your bug.
I think I'm not a too bad guru, so please give me some truth... I could have
done the udev update by myself.
If you want to maintain it by yourself, please tell me. (or move it to
another
section, I still don't understand why udev is in disk section, as it is not
restricted to "disks" :-p )
Thanks in advance, I hope my words will be not misunderstood and that we can
now work better together. :-)
--
Flavien Bridault
Source Mage GNU/Linux - Disk Guru
IRC : vlaaad
Jabber : vlaaad AT amessage.be
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpS6FZpuqZeI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
Geoffrey Derber, 02/11/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 02/12/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/12/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
Flavien Bridault, 02/12/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
Flavien Bridault, 02/12/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/12/2005
-
Re: [smgl] Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
Treeve Jelbert, 02/12/2005
- Re: [smgl] Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions, Flavien Bridault, 02/12/2005
- Re: [smgl] Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions, Jason Flatt, 02/12/2005
- Re: Updating Maintained Sections (Was Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions), George Sherwood, 02/12/2005
- Re: Updating Maintained Sections (Was Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions), Arwed von Merkatz, 02/12/2005
- Re: Updating Maintained Sections (Was Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions), Eric Sandall, 02/12/2005
- Re: [smgl] Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions, Arjan Bouter, 02/13/2005
- Re: [smgl] Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions, Flavien Bridault, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [smgl] Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
Treeve Jelbert, 02/12/2005
- Re: [smgl] Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions, Ladislav Hagara, 02/14/2005
- Re: [smgl] Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions, Flavien Bridault, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/12/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
Flavien Bridault, 02/12/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
Flavien Bridault, 02/12/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/12/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions,
Jason Flatt, 02/12/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev.permissions, Flavien Bridault, 02/12/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.